The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:20, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DXFL[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted CSD A7 (and, before that, as a hoax ~~although that seems very dubious~~). I'm tempted to tag it CSD A7 again, but the comment about being the 'pioneer station' could be seen as a claim to notability. However, does not meet WP:ORGCRITE or WP:GNG. Very little coverage, and the only real significance is the attack on the station, but that alone hardly seems enough to establish notability especially given the paucity of coverage. Hugsyrup (talk) 15:02, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:17, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:17, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was a hoax. It was an article written in 2014 that talked of events in 2015 in the past tense. Uncle G (talk) 15:19, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok, sorry. I was trying to work out how an article about a station that seems to exist could be a blatant hoax, but that makes sense. Hugsyrup (talk) 15:57, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This seems pretty unremarkable, A7 definitely fits this one. Almy (talk) 16:20, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.