The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, without prejudice against restoration to draft if additional sources can be found to support notability. It is correctly pointed out that there is a paucity of sources supporting inclusion of this subject, which is consistent with an absence of notability. BD2412 T 02:48, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Daman Sood[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a sound recording engineer, making no claim of notability beyond the fact that he exists and citing no sourcing beyond his staff profile on the self-published website of his own employer. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass WP:GNG on his sourceability. Bearcat (talk) 21:18, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and India. Bearcat (talk) 21:18, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment One non-trivial mention in a book: [1] and a few mentions in GNews, first one looks notable, [2]. Oaktree b (talk) 23:58, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"The BCI" is an organization, not a GNG-eligible media outlet, and that hit is a Q&A interview in which he's talking about himself in the first person. Bearcat (talk) 00:58, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notable’ Veteran sound engineer, article needs to be build upon. Media sources would be scant, some work would be required thus. Incidentally found it while searching for him. So I believe worth saving. Let’s work on it . Indian cinema and Indian music task force can be notified --Ekabhishek^talk 05:56, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Notable" and "media sources would be scant" cannot coexist. Notability is specifically a measure of the quality and depth of a person's media sourcing, and thus inherently cannot be achieved at all without media sourcing. Bearcat (talk) 14:24, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:29, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 02:11, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The subject is not notable and the article makes no support for inclusion in Wikipedia. I agree that there is a contradiction in saying a subject is notable and that sources are hard to find. IrishOsita (talk) 02:54, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.