The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Tone 20:12, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Elconin[edit]

Dan Elconin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a WP:COATRACK article — it's nominally about an author, but in truth almost all of the content is actually about his novel, which itself failed a previous AFD. There's also no sourced evidence of notability demonstrated here; none of the "references" are independent sources. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 05:09, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G4, "recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion". The article is substantially identical to the article Never After which was deleted as a result of a deletion discussion. - DustFormsWords (talk) 05:15, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, concur. Clearly WP:COATRACK for deleted content. On the outside chance that reliable sources establishing notability have appeared since that AFD 5 months ago (just before publication), I'd suggest letting it run the full 5 days though. Studerby (talk) 08:15, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per comments above. Author has only one published book that itself is not notable. Adding Speedy tag. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 19:53, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.