The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G4 and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Pacheco and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Pacheco (2nd nomination). The original article location had been protected, but it looks like this one will have to be now as well... пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 15:31, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dani Pacheco[edit]

Contested PROD. The subject hasn't played in a fully professional league and so fails WP:BIO. Mattythewhite (talk) 10:12, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

keeppreviously with barcelona now with liverpool two of biggest clubs in world football .being discussed on liverpool official website now. admin need to rethink and rewrite the football rules /criteria for wp athlete.whether this lad makes it which most feel he will he is already known in the football world.as said on steve elliott talk supporters managers and others use wikipedia to find out about players.this means more use of wikipedia so becoming more popular.also i believe pacheco has a liverpool squad number. try telling the liverpool fans hes not really a proper footballer.90.193.209.63 (talk) 00:15, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, the subject fails WP:ATHLETE --Angelo (talk) 10:50, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, may well become notable in the future - even if not with Liverpool - but at the moment does not pass WP:ATHLETE. Wheelchair Epidemic (talk) 12:09, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 12:43, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice, recreate if he ever makes an appearance in a fully-pro competition. Youth caps do not confer notability either. --Jimbo^[online] 15:17, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.