The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:33, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Hamenyimana Jr.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable per WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG Kharkiv07 (T) 13:30, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:44, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:28, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:29, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 09:29, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:30, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 09:54, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 18:19, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:56, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a non-notable footballer. Adamtt9 (talk) 21:46, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - far WP:TOOSOON, few footballers pass WP:GNG & WP:NFOOTY before the age of 20. Article can always be recreated in the future when subject passes the guidelines. I see a possible potential for future development. Inter&anthro (talk) 22:05, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.