- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 03:27, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Daniel Koch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No notability. Fails WP:GNG. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 03:51, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent)|lambast 07:00, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent)|lambast 07:00, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Clearly passes WP:POLITICIAN as a member of a state legislature. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:18, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. All state legislators, even legislators-elect, are considered notable.Billy Hathorn (talk) 16:29, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep member of the Pennsylvania State Legislature. Enos733 (talk) 18:27, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep per above (state legislators get a free pass) and a note of caution to @Winkelvi: that it may be unnecessary to go after every article created by Kbabej and to please check the notability criteria before nominating any more of them. Valfontis (talk) 08:31, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep State legislators are notable. Thank you-RFD (talk) 12:43, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.