The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Anyone who wants to keep this article is welcome to follow Czar's suggestion and present any non-trivial sources to me, but as of now no one has tried. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:03, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Padua[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Anyway a hacker's friends can create many unreliable website sources. A simple google search has no good reslut for this hacker, and google news search has nothing, not even a passing mention. The one mention is not him.

Searching his alternate name as mentioned in the article. --Marvellous Spider-Man 16:12, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:47, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:47, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:GNG per the sources on the article. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 15:50, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable hacker.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:23, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:35, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The links that work are to social media and blog-type sites. Most of the supposed major projects are redlinks, and the one WP:RS link returns a 404 error. Not finding anything about this Daniel Padua through searches (high false positive rate). Adds up to non-notable. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:53, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not too hard to track down the Wired article (search for its name), but the topic is a passing mention in it czar 02:50, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Review sources from his pt wiki article? pt:Daniel Pádua czar 02:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar 02:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:45, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.