The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:28, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Stevens (soccer)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested by Dps104 (talk · contribs) with the explanation of "This player is considered notable." However, there appears little proof of this to me as the article fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Mattythewhite (talk) 11:56, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:59, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:59, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:59, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – shows no indication of notability per WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG, as he didn't play in a fully professional league. – Kosm1 fent 15:07, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: As the nominator said, this articles fails all criteria of notability. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 01:34, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:33, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 11:42, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. --sparkl_!sm ^hey! 19:35, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.