The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 20:56, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Street[edit]

Daniel Street (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Remove--not a notable person. Hundreds and hundreds of scholars in Cambridge have the same profile as this person.Wikipedia is a untrust worthy source for academic articles (talk) 19:22, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note Fixed the AfD. Raymie Humbert (tc) 19:32, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
claimed notability is as a broadcaster, not a scholar. DGG ( talk ) 05:43, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not notable. One Television Correspondent does not suffice a Wiki Entry. What was his mark in reporting?62.173.69.98 (talk) 09:28, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.