The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite 07:28, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Danielle Roche[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established. References are for minor, local awards and the feature in Teen Vogue appears to be a blog with a monthly "spotlight interview"—not significant coverage. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 02:19, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. B.Rossow ^talk_contr 17:42, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete notability entirely unclear Vartanza (talk) 04:22, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:25, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - There's certainly secondary sources for her notability; it's only a question of whether those sources are themselves notable or reliable. It's a tough call when phrases like "big on YouTube" may support either genuine notability or complete obscurity. Unless anyone's able to give good reasons why we don't like the citations, keep. - DustFormsWords (talk) 06:40, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: As said in the nom, the feature in Teen Vogue appears to be a blog with an interview. It seems to be a "face in the crowd" interview, and there's nothing there on why the subject is notable. It is not significant coverage.

As far the other sources, let's see. One is a profile of a school that lists the subject as being in Teen Vogue and a winner of an non-notable award (nothing on google about it). There's a "reference" for Blurb, which appears to be a site where users can self-publish their artwork in a book. There's there a reference of a high school newspaper site announcing their local award that they won. Finally, there's a quick mention of the subject's leather jacket as a "myspace muse" in a seemingly non-notable fashion website.

The references are not wp:reliable sources, they don't claim or establish notability for the subject. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 08:20, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No significant coverage in reliable sources, no major awards received. Lara 19:56, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.