The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Additional reference discovered. (non-admin closure) scope_creep^Talk 18:18, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Danielle Younge-Ullman[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable writer. Fails WP:AUTHOR, WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep^Talk 15:12, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'm the author of the article and here's why it should be kept: She does not fail WP:AUTHOR as one of her books was a finalist for the 2017 Governor General Literary Award and therefore qualifies under criteria #3. She's also a notable person, as independant reliable sources give her coverage. I can dig through newspapers and add more, which was part of the reason I originally had the article in draft space (as I planned to improve it). I was busy, and do other stuff on-wiki in the meantime. Yesterday, the draft was deleted under G13 as abandoned, and I submitted a WP:REFUND request to contunie working on it. I moved it to mainspace to prevent it from being deleted again under G13 if I got busy again, as I'm a grade 12 student and I might not be as active on Wikipedia for periods of time because of my obligations as a student. Clovermoss (talk) 15:23, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

scope_creep No wikiprojects have been notified of this discussion. Would it be okay if WP:Canada and WP:Women in Red were notified of this AfD? Clovermoss (talk) 15:55, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Clovermoss: Of course!!. The process will add all interested groups in shortly anyway. Hope that helps.scope_creep^Talk 16:23, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:23, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:24, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:24, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – The author was interviewed by CBC, Canada's national public broadcaster for radio and TV [1]. The author also was interviewed by the Toronto Star (Canada's highest-circulation newspaper) for a story about the house she lives in [2]. Her book, Everything Beautiful is Not Ruined won the White Pine Award, a national Canadian award. [3] The book was reviewed by The Globe and Mail [4], Teen Vogue [5], and others. CBC named it one of the best Canadian YA/children's books of 2017 [6] and one of 150 books on "The great Canadian reading list" [7]. Another book, Falling Under was reviewed by Good Housekeeping [8]. She passes the WP:NBIO/WP:NAUTHOR bar for me. – Levivich 17:26, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
'Comment I notice one of her books has been reviewed by the Guardian, and the Telegraph. So that is a sold keep. Withdrawn. scope_creep^Talk 18:17, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.