The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (but article needs some cleanup and better attribution of existing source material). Non-admin closure per WP:DPR. Serpent's Choice 12:12, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dannion Brinkley[edit]

Dannion Brinkley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)

Lack of Multiple nontrivial reliable sources about this person, failure of verifiability and notability. - crz crztalk 18:06, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep A sliver of notability as author of a book published by a real publisher (Harpercollins). Also, Moody referred to the case as "The most amazing and complete near-death experience of the twenty thousand I have encountered." Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:33, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. A poorly written article that makes it sound like all he did was survive getting hit by lightning, but Saved by the Light was a major bestseller that got made into a TV-movie[1], spawned book sequels, and made him a New Age guru. --Groggy Dice T | C 01:42, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep, there is something but is it notable? Alf photoman 15:40, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• keep if Andrew L adds his comment to the article, because then it's clear why it's of some notability.DGG 01:22, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.