The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 17:41, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Danzelle St Louis Hamilton[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not played a full international or in a fully professional league. Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. PROD template was removed with no reason given. Del_♉sion23 (talk) 00:05, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Del_♉sion23 (talk) 00:09, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Del_♉sion23 (talk) 00:10, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning this article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:55, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 11:37, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete He's played in one of the grey-area leagues, but I can't see him passing WP:GNG, so it won't be enough to keep him. [1], [2], [3] and [4] are all sources I can find on him, but these are all local-area newspapers, not enough to satisfy WP:GNG. Lukeno94 (talk) 12:13, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to insufficient sourcing.--Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 21:22, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:02, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - article is about a footballer who hasn't played in a fully pro league or represented his country at senior level, which means that the subject fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Also fails WP:GNG, as he hasn't received significant coverage in reliable sources. Mentoz86 (talk) 16:36, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.