The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear consensus to delete - the option to merge/redirect was considered, but I do not feel that this is appropriate in this case -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 13:18, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dark house[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another sub genre of a sub genre of a sub genre. This time it's a term some people to describe a slightly slower version of the same music. Once again these dance music genres are endless and none of them are unique from the others. Ridernyc (talk) 04:28, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is 0 source practically, plus someone noted it being a sub genre of progressive house, which is totally wrong. Suggestion — delete the article, merge 2 phrase info into tech house or tribal house. Shadiac (talk) 06:51, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Totally subjective and undefinable term for another music sub genre. Guyonthesubway (talk) 15:59, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to house music or to a relevant major subgenre per Shadiac (I should note that "merge and delete" is not a valid act per Wikipedia's license; if there is a merge there must be at most a redirect, in order to preserve attribution). In general, if a subgenre term is in use (i.e. it is a valid search term), but not independently notable, the proper thing to do is merge and redirect to the parent genre. This can be done without taking it to AfD, as no admin-only actions are necessary. — Gwalla | Talk 19:51, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No sources there are. Also, the list of song examples only includes fourteen songs, some of which do not even have wikipedia articles representative of the musicians behind them! The list shouldn't even be there in the first place. Bah! Backtable _{Speak to me}^{concerning my deeds.} 02:42, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Since the lack of evidence for the term means that there is no way of guessing where to redirect even if it is a likely search.--SabreBD (talk) 10:19, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.