The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mortal Kombat vs. DC universe. MBisanz ^talk 02:57, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dark kahn[edit]

Dark kahn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Subject is definitely not worthy of its own article. It's poorly-written, unsourced, in-universe, contains spoilers, and is more of a rush to be the first to post information about the new Mortal Kombat vs. DC Universe game on Wiki than an attempt to contribute anything remotely encyclopedic. sixtynine ^{• spill it •} 03:27, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Delete- no sources, no assertion of notability, full of fan speculation. Reyk _YO! 03:58, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, but create a redirect to Mortal Kombat vs. DC universe at Dark Kahn if someone can dig up evidence he's actually in the game. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:30, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 12:05, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect as suggested by MacGyverMagic. Here's some verification. Marasmusine (talk) 18:30, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Listen, I played the game, beat it, learned all i could about Dark Kahn, and you insult my article. Most video game pages have spoilers and people come here to learn, if people want to know about Dark Kahn, they are going to get hit with spoilers because he's only in this one game there is proof and I myself donated a picture to Wikipedia of him. If you don't like the article, edit it, that's what everyone else does, plus I waited a few days after beating the game to make that article, because no one else did. Riverstinson

• Comment Nobody's disputing the fact that he's in the game, but since it's a minor character that likely will not appear again in MK canon, any information could have instead gone into the Shao Kahn article, the main MK/DC page, or the minor MK characters page. Plus, the game is not even a week old, so is it really necessary to go posting (unsourced) character endings just yet? Wiki is not a game guide. The lone source itself is fairly weak, as it does not go into any real detail about who Dark Kahn is or what he does. sixtynine ^{• spill it •} 00:32, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Nothing personal. Just that the article fails to meet guidelines including WP:N and WP:V because of a lack of reliable third-party sources. The article only has a trivial mention in one review, which isn't really enough to verify anything substantial or show this article is notable. Randomran (talk) 21:40, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.