The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Beyond NFOOTY, for a footballer playing almost 100 years ago, sufficient sources have been provided to indicate GNG, even going back that far. Fenix down (talk) 13:35, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Roberts (English footballer)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL having never played outside whatever the Republic of Ireland was called then or a senior international game. Fails WP:GNG also. Dougal18 (talk) 21:30, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:56, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:56, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:56, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:56, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable footballer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I haven't found any sources of my own since I don't have paid access to Irish historical newspapers, but I struggle to believe the League of Ireland top scorer and someone who scored the winning goal in an Irish cup final would fail WP:GNG. Per WP:NEXIST, typing "Dave Roberts" into www.irishnewsarchive.com and limiting the results to 1923-1926 brought up a couple results. SportingFlyer T·C 23:47, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I wonder if the fact that he played for the League of Ireland XI at a time when its games were seen as highly significant (and almost as internationals) in the Republic of Ireland gives him enough notability? Dunarc (talk) 20:31, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As the article now suggests he played in Football League I think there is definitely a strong case for Keep. Dunarc (talk) 20:50, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: I am almost persuaded to agree with User:SportingFlyer. I will surmise the subject is not alive so not a BLP. The sources are a bit sketchy on birth and possible death dates but with all the totally non-notable live players having articles I could see this as historical. Otr500 (talk) 06:16, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes WP:NFOOTBALL because he played in the English Football League for Walsall before going to Ireland. Added to his achivements already mentioned: top-scoring in the LoI while playing for the title-winners, scoring for the winning side in the Cup Final, and 3 appearances for the League of Ireland XI, and some individual coverage which I've added to the article, there's enough to suggest a GNG pass. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 14:36, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Struway2 updates certainly help, if that's right he passes WP:NFOOTBALL for playing when Div 3 was divided into North and South. Govvy (talk) 15:23, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 15:55, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per Struway2. Giant Snowman 15:56, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per Struway2. If he played in the English Football League at a time when it was the top level league in England, that should be enough pass WP:NFOOTBALL on its own; his career in Ireland also seems notable. GirthSummit _(blether) 10:11, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as above. Played in the English Football League. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:23, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.