- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Subject has played in at least one fully professional league and so clearly meets the subject-specific guideline. Closing as there is no reasonable chance of suitable delete arguments being presented, there is no need to keep this open for purely bureaucratic reasons. Fenix down (talk) 11:50, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- David Kasumu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Reason FilthyDon (talk) 02:28, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:04, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 20:03, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 20:03, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Consensus is that appearing in a league cup match between two clubs which play in a WP:FPL is enough to meet WP:NFOOTY. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 20:05, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, per above. I don't understand this nomination. This article and Andrew Osei-Bonsu were both created by the nominator, quite properly, after the players made their debuts in the League Cup match. Long-time consensus being that playing in the cup competition of a fully professional league meets the spirit if not the letter of WP:NFOOTBALL. Yet within hours of creating the pages, their creator nominates them for deletion? cheers, Struway2 (talk) 08:39, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.