The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow Keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 22:52, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

David McMillan (footballer)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. JMHamo (talk) 14:26, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo (talk) 14:30, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - 9 Europa League appearances, 6 goals in 9 Champions League appearances. 65 goals in 175 top-tier Irish appearances. None of these things meet WP:NFOOTY but I'd think he'd have gathered some press - but I've not had time to research. Nfitz (talk) 16:53, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Ridiculous nomination as player is clearly notable. He has made 9 Europa League appearances, scored 6 goals in 9 Champions League appearances. Will be playing in European Group Stages later this season. Exactly what does an Irish semi-pro footballer have to do to be notable. Djln Djln (talk) 17:06, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What does an Irish footballer need to do - 30 seconds of a late-game substitutation for about-to-be-regulated Little Nowhere FC, in the 4th tier of English football would do it. Nfitz (talk) 21:53, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:16, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:16, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 18:55, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete - League of Ireland Premier Division is not presently listed as a fully-professional league, so any matches played in cup competitions do not meet the requirements of WP:NFOOTY, even against clubs which are part of an FPL. As McMillan has not play senior international football or in the Olympics, he must meet WP:GNG. The first, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth references in the article are routine coverage and therefore cannot be used to meet GNG. The second reference is about McMillan receiving a minor writers' award, hardly enough to generate presumed notability. I cannot find any other coverage in Google which could be used to meet GNG. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 19:03, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If you Google "David McMillan" and Dundalk you get 91,600 results but he's not notable. Really ? And the "minor writers' award" has it's own article – League of Ireland Premier Division Player of the Month Djln Djln (talk) 20:54, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - as one would expect, there's a lot of media coverage. In particular, there's a recent profile [1] that meets WP:GNG. Nfitz (talk) 21:53, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete has not played in a fully pro league, does not pass the notability guidelines for footballers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:41, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment He is currently the top scorer in the 2016–17 UEFA Champions League. Is that really not notable enough for you ? Djln Djln (talk) 01:25, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am currently working on improving this article at my sandbox. Some of his more recent career is definitely notable. I recommend editors check my sandbox before voting to delete article. Djln Djln (talk) 02:01, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep See [2], [3], [4], [5], and [6]. RonSigPi (talk) 02:46, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:GNG and has made multiple appearances in European Competitions.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:45, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This recent purge of Irish top division footballers clearly demonstrates a need to be rather less dogmatic about the application of WP:FPL. While it seems to enjoy exalted status amongst a handful of unfortunate Wiki Geeks (© FourFourTwo), let's not forget it's only an essay. And a dubious essay at that. We can see from User:Djln/sandbox and WP:Articles for deletion/Kevin Doherty (footballer) that a player with a sustained career in the top division of Irish football will invariably attract non-trivial coverage in national media. 2A02:C7D:46F1:2B00:2591:F14C:A077:791 (talk) 13:14, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - probably scrapes through on GNG. Giant Snowman 17:57, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Fails NFOOTY, but passes wider GNG. Significant, non-routine coverage can be found in the sources shown above. Fenix down (talk) 16:28, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Have now updated article and in my opinion it clearly passes any sensible notability criteria. Stats in infobox and lower section are not 100% accurate, mainly because he is still active. Any volunteers to double check/update stats ? Djln Djln (talk) 18:44, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - In light of the sources provided by RonSigPi, I am changing my !vote. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 20:51, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Clearly passes the WP:GNG criteria, particularly in light of extensive recent coverage nationally and internationally. --IrishTennis (talk) 13:34, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Easily satisfies WP:GNG with ample coverage from numerous sources. Smartyllama (talk) 14:08, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, more than enough media coverage to pass WP:GNG. --Jimbo^[online] 16:39, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.