The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. X clamation point 01:15, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dawn Csutoros[edit]

This article on an artist presents no evidence that she is notable. Grahame (talk) 09:00, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 09:00, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Completely unreferenced with notability not demonstrated. However, if some work was done on the article that demonstrates to the reader why the artist is notable, and included reliable online references to back it up, I'd be willing to change my stance.--Lester 21:52, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 06:55, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. This page on her website, if details were confirmed, improves the notability case, but not enough imo. Johnbod (talk) 13:51, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
keep I found several references to recent exhibitions and residencies. I also found essays on her work. I'll try to add them to the article today when I have time. Jenafalt (talk) 08:22, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The residencies, book covers and solo exhibitions listed on her website show that she is a working artist, but not necessarily a notable one. Some press reviews would help.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 13:17, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.