The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Withdrawn due to consensus and article improvement. (non-admin closure) — Dengero (talk) 01:34, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dawn McCafferty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is every one-star commander worth an article of itself? Nothing else notable about this particular individual I can see. Dengero (talk) 14:52, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I would agree that not every one-star is worth a page, however there are plenty of people here on Wikipedia who have done sod-all for the world at large. However this lady/Commodore is incharge of the newest generation of cadets, but more than that established the Families Federation of the RAF. To say the least this lady is active.

I would say it would be a shame when we have so many mundane people stored in the vaults that we would consider somebody as active as this.

Anyway, I have expanded the article with more info and background stuff, an extra reference and gave it a bit better layout.

Kindest regards,

(MrNiceGuy1113 (talk) 16:36, 8 November 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. All officers of general, flag or air rank are generally considered to be notable under WP:SOLDIER and WP:COMMONSENSE. -- Necrothesp (talk) 17:04, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Yup, per WP:SOLDIER, every one-star commander is notable and therefore is eligible for an article. Bgwhite (talk) 19:10, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - also, I think a female reserve officer given command of an organization of 10,000 volunteers and 40,000 cadets is more interesting than your average one-star general. JohnCD (talk) 21:07, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.