The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:46, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Daytonnati[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

article is about a neologism which isn't used in any kind of local vernacular, only 3 sentences long, and has only 1 real source (a newspaper article from 1998) Bobbysirchism (talk) 13:40, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:44, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:44, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete my search largely turned up total mirrors of this article. So to date the consensus seems to be this is not yet a thing at all, and so expecting there to be an agreed upon name for something that does not yet exist is unreasonable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: ineligible for soft deletion as it was previously deprodded, would prefer a stronger consensus than a quorum of 1 (2 including nom)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor ^Talk 15:39, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No significant coverage of this term was found in my BEFORE-style search. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 16:21, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not widely used, just one writer's neologism. Reywas92^Talk 18:18, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NEO. Even if its usage was well-documented, it wouldn't be appropriate here - we're not a dictionary. The fact that there's virtually no record of it makes our job even easier. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:11, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete My BEFORE search came up with this article, a few Wikipedia mirrors, a Reddit post, a DGuide entry, the 1998 newspaper article cited here (and a similar one published one week later by the same paper), and another website that's just a copy and paste of this article. Also fails WP:NEO.--🌀Kieran207-talk 🌀 23:54, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per everybody above. If the idea described here ever comes to pass, it will justify an article, but the title of that article will likely be something like Cincinnati-Dayton Combined Statistical Area instead. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:59, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.