The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Snow Delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:41, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per A7: Tagged it as such. Lugia2453 (talk) 20:16, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
SPEEDY Delete This is when I wish i was an admin --Sue Rangell✍ ✉ 00:52, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have declined the A7. It is only necessary to give some bona fide indicate or plausible significance or importance to pass A7. Saying a website has 5 million visitors a month and 618,524 followers passes this very low bar. whether it is actually notable must be decided here. DGG ( talk ) 06:07, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, and very understandable. Can we get a Snow Close? --Sue Rangell✍ ✉ 21:01, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not seem to pass WP:GNG and obviously promotional. GHits are painfully devoid of any substantial third-party reviews or mentions. §FreeRangeFrog 23:42, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.