The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No arguments have been presented to counter the deletion rationales after two weeks, so I think closing this as delete is appropriate. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:10, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dean Barker (editor)[edit]

Dean Barker (editor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Of the 13 references provided 2 are about Barker (Boston Globe and Wall Street Journal), the rest are either about the blog he writes or are primary sources from the blog itself and dont do much to establish the notability of this biography. One reference doesn't even mention Barker at all. Perhaps an article about the blog would be more appropriate. RadioFan (talk) 02:36, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:20, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Seconded. Delete and potentially create an article about the blog. Gosox5555 (talk) 15:34, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.