The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by User:RHaworth per CSD G4. (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decade of darkness[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Several reasons. The article title is unsatisfactory: 'decade of darkness' is just a cheap journalistic phrase, I'm sure it's been used elswhere. More to the point, this is essentially an article which risks being a POV fork. TheLongTone (talk) 22:53, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This article was previously deleted as as a biased WP:NPOV WP:AXE and it still is. Essentially a political Soapbox. - Ahunt (talk) 23:17, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thought it rang a bell. If it's a recreation, can't it be speedied?TheLongTone (talk) 23:23, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes as WP:G4, it was at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Decade of Darkness. I will tag it for CSD. - Ahunt (talk) 23:40, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

...and it is gone again. - Ahunt (talk) 00:57, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.