The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Of note is that the nominator has essentially withdrawn, stating in part, "I'm satisfied it now meets notability ..." in a comment within the discussion. Overall consensus is for the article to be retained. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:48, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decanter (magazine)[edit]

Decanter (magazine) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't seem to find notability. I searched through google but a considerable number of search results only showed standard pages associated with magazines (i.e. subscription offers). Couldn't find anything independent, reliable, significant etc. It did have considerably more content 3 years back that was non neutral/COI in nature https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Decanter_(magazine)&oldid=545263043 which was subsequently removed. On top of the perceived lack of notability, the article is very short of useful info and sources (the 3 sources also being primary). Rayman60 (talk) 00:26, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:52, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:52, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete yeah, a promotional article that got cleaned up and there's nothing left after the cleanup - David Gerard (talk) 07:24, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, I just expanded the article. Among other things, the magazine has been described as " "arguably the most influential wine periodical in the world" (Wine Wars by Mike Veseth, Rowman & Littlefield), or "one of the world's leading wine magazines" (Wine Marketing: A Practical Guide by Colin Michael Hall and Richard Mitchell, Routledge) and its website as well is "widely recognized as a leading online wine magazine" (Wine Brands: Success Strategies for New Markets, New Consumers and New Trends by Evelyne Resnick, Springer Publishing). Clearly notable (and authorative) in its field. Cavarrone 09:51, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep -- in addition to above listed sources, this presents WP:SIGCOV on the subject: Wine Brands: Success Strategies for New Markets, New Consumers and New Trends by Evelyne Resnick. The book is published by Palgrave Macmillan so it does appear to be RS. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:57, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - Initially I just saw a lot of self-referenced, unverifiable claims of its position within the wine world. I'm satisfied it now meets notability and the article is looking better.Rayman60 (talk) 18:08, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.