The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nja²⁴⁷ 12:07, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deceptive Safari 4 marketing[edit]

Deceptive Safari 4 marketing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

NPOV title, although sourced the whole tone of the article is misjudged. The Safari page is short enough to have this section merged back into it and the NPOV addressed there. Darrenhusted (talk) 11:51, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and Merge with the Safari 4 article. Gosox5555 (talk) 14:44, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 16:07, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 16:07, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. --Evil Eccentric (talk) 21:45, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. While there are some pertinent facts in this article, they are presented in such a biased manner that there is almost nothing of worth left. If someone has an hour's time to merge some of this into the Safari 4 article properly then great, otherwise just delete it all. aLii (talk) 09:10, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.