The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 14:38, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Def Dames Dope

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 13:55, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and Belgium. Shaws username . talk . 15:05, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shaws username . talk . 15:08, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain why this article would not have sufficient notability? It has an article in Dutch https://nl.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Def_Dames_Dope

And if I search on Google I get plenty of results. This group is quite notable within the Eurodance scene. Thanks for clarification. Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 15:16, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The page has zero references, and the only thing that links to it is a redirect and a list of top-30 Number 1 singles. This doesn't suggest notability to me. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 15:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then add ((Unreferenced)) Shadow311 (talk) 16:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable and easily meets WP:BAND#2 - many record releases in a national chart. This include topping the chart - per the list here. ResonantDis_tortion 09:17, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as an easy pass of WP:BAND #2. It took the nominator 2 minutes from their previous edit to set this AfD in motion. The following text: The page has zero references [...] This doesn't suggest notability to me appears to show disrespect for the golden WP:NEXIST rule and strengthens the impression that no serious WP:BEFORE was performed. gidonb (talk) 20:14, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.