The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲‍水 11:22, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dejan Iliev[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD. Concern was Non-notable youth player who fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. This remains valid. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:39, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:41, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – has not played at a sufficiently high level or received sufficient coverage. C 679 17:51, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 18:33, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NFOOTBALL says that the player is notable if he had played in a fully professional league. According to this site, he had only played in the UEFA Youth League, U21 Premier League and U21-EM-Quali, and they all aren't regarded as 'fully professional league', according to this list. Furthermore, the player doesn't have sufficient media coverage to pass GNG. Alex^{discussion ★} 21:16, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Fenix down (talk) 08:42, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.LM2000 (talk) 09:48, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Macedonia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – has not played at a high enough level or received sufficient coverage. C 679 09:21, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.