The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:HEY. Although the article still has WP:PROBLEMS, the references added put its notability beyond doubt. Non-admin closure by Skomorokh 05:51, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deltathree[edit]

Deltathree (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non notable. Article is for the purposes of promotion the company only. No references to articles Ernestvoice (talk) 16:03, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete non-notable advertizing. DJ Clayworth (talk) 16:17, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 17:59, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I added some references. --Eastmain (talk) 17:59, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Only incidental mention of this company in Eastmain's references, as part of the broader VoIP sector, insufficient to establish notability. RayAYang (talk) 19:00, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Following edits, change to Keep. But the article still has rather serious POV and context issues. It's hard to say how it fares versus its competitors, except that getting de-listed from NASDAQ is probably not a good sign. RayAYang (talk) 01:09, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Tidied up and added even more references - should unequivocally pass WP:CORP now. Gr1st (talk) 23:10, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.