The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep because they have played at the third level of US soccer . пﮟოьεԻ 57 09:25, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Detroit Wheels (soccer)[edit]

Detroit Wheels (soccer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Does not appear to be a notable team. PROD contested. Stifle (talk) 11:58, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - it is at least as notable as all the fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth, etc. division European teams which never seem to have their notability challenged. Mohrflies (talk) 18:35, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:58, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:59, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Don't see why this is any less notable than any other USL team, or why any such team would be non-notable. Rlendog (talk) 16:08, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related page moves. --Jimbo^[online] 08:56, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.