The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ‑Scottywong| talk _ 18:21, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disney Channels Worldwide[edit]

Disney Channels Worldwide (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete or Merge It looks like a hoax and there are no references, all just original research! Definitely delete or incorporate the information into Disney Channel WooHoo! • Talk to me! 02:32, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Not a hoax at all; pretty much the go-to page for any Disney Channel networks internationally that would be basically 'Disney Channel (Country) airs the network's American and British shows with local dubbing/subtitling and little to no deviation' so better to redirect there, and there are sources in the article. False entries are easily removed through common vandalism patrolling. Nate • (chatter) 02:48, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:48, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:48, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:48, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong keep. Not a hoax and referenced, although it could use more. This article is a list of Disney companies across the globe and is linked to by most of its parent articles. A merge of this page into one or more of those would make them huge, unwieldy, and near-unnavigable. — Wyliepedia 14:35, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep. I'm sure it no hoax. Spshu Stinks (talk) 10:03, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spshu Stinks is a sockpuppet, and has been blocked indefintiely. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:35, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Ain't no hoax and it is notable, bro. The Toon Disney Guy (talk) 10:23, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.