The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, and block article creator as hoaxer. DS (talk) 02:04, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Doku[edit]

This article is a hoax intended to embarrass Wikipedia and its users likely by showing that they will assume anything that looks professional and uses hard-copy sources is unquestionably true. Some evidence (copied from the talk page: 1)On this thread the author announces that he's going to Wikipedia to create a hoax article, and uses the same name as he does here. This thread may soon be deleted however; 2) I assume that the author used paper books as sources to make the hoax harder to uncover. However, I must say, he didn't do such a good job as the books in question don't even seem to exist. Furthermore, the title of the second book would be misspelled even if it did exist: Brazil is spelled Brasil in Portuguese and Ou means "or" not "the". I would have just used plain old speedy deletion but I've been told that it's not appropriate for suspected hoax articles. Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 01:57, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.