The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:39, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dorothy Teasley[edit]

Dorothy Teasley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCHESS, not a notable chess player at all. Sophia91 (talk) 17:52, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Sophia91 (talk) 17:52, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 19:01, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:16, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - fails WP:NCHESS and I can't find any evidence of sources (searched both google and my university library databases) that would help her pass WP:GNG/WP:BASIC. No indication that she meets WP:ANYBIO either. Samsmachado (talk) 17:29, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails the notability guidelines for chess players.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:36, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.