The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 04:43, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Downward[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't believe that the book currently meets the notability requirements for books. Pichpich (talk) 20:51, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete absolutely fails WP:NBOOK, no news sources or articles found. - SanAnMan (talk) 20:56, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:27, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I wish the author well, but there just isn't any coverage for the book in independent and reliable sources that establish notability. To be fair, it's really difficult for indie and self-published books to gain coverage, but it's still required. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:46, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No significant coverage found. Gab4gab (talk) 13:37, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.