The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:53, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dream League Soccer[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable mobile game. Could not find significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources. CoolSkittle (talk) 01:17, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 03:11, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 03:11, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. John M Wolfson (talk) 03:53, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:23, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:23, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete iOS/Android games usually have to go some way to prove notability. This one fails. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 07:47, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 10:19, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 10:20, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Erm, why don't you people go look up the game reviews and add them, WP:GNG is established by game reviews instead of voting your ballshit delete without doing the research. Govvy (talk) 10:41, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
:P CoolSkittle (talk) 11:34, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because it doesn't have any [1]. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:28, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I did find indepth reviews on LiveMint [2] and Gamereactor [3], but I don't find it enough to make this game pass WP:GNG. Pinging CoolSkittle, John M Wolfson, Lee Vilenski and GiantSnowman for opinions. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:11, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Game Reactor is listed as inconclusive at WP:VG/RS, but I don't feel it's reliable. The complete lack of reviews at metacritic is quite damning. The VG custom search brings up some more [4], but the only review I've found that isn't a forum post or blog was [5]. And, to be fair, I'm not happy about pushing notability to an article of two paragraphs, where the name of the game and logo don't match. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:28, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Vilenski I saw the TouchArcade one and I skipped on it, it says nothing indepth about the game and is not a source that should be included at all. Even if Gamereactor is included, it is still two reviews, and I feel like that is too WP:BARE. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:40, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per Lee Vilenski. CoolSkittle (talk) 13:23, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment For a game I am hearing of for the first time, I find it shocking at how the game is popular on Wikipedia [6]. I don't see 1000+ daily views video game article that often. Of course views do not matter towards notability on Wikipedia, but found it interesting. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:40, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Game has nearly a 150k iOS [7] User reviews, so I am sure there is more online if people look for it like these, [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13] and there is more around if you bother to look deep enough. Seriously, that took me five whole minutes and I am sure if people spent half an hour on the subject of this game, GNG would easily be considered. Govvy (talk) 14:33, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Wait, you're serious? CoolSkittle (talk) 15:09, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

None of those are considered reliable sources except for Pocket Gamer, and that source is so short it’s not likely to be considered significant coverage. Sergecross73 msg me 23:12, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 23:54, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.