The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SoWhy 12:07, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dusty Collins[edit]

Dusty Collins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 03:11, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:50, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:50, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:51, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:29, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep played around 150 AHL matches, NHOCKEY says 200. As part of a batch nomination, this is close enough to the cutoff I don't support deletion. Power~enwiki (talk) 23:01, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Technically he's played 174 games that can be counted, but players that fell less than 10 games short of the 200 game criteria have been removed. There is nothing that I can find that would give him a GNG pass. Deadman137 (talk) 04:39, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Regardless of NHOCKEY (which itself still is subject to GNG), all sources I found are stats pages or brief mentions. This is the very definition of WP:ROUTINE coverage which does not count towards GNG, and why the 200 game minimum has increased from 100 games over the years. I am sure there are a couple 200+ players that fail GNG as well (likely because they are defensive defensemen and don't score enough to generate coverage). Yosemiter (talk) 15:01, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• (Weak) Delete - I found this source, but it is his stats as part of Manitoba Moose hockey team. He fails WP:V#Notability as the source doesn't indicate his prominence to his field. Also, I found other sources, but they still don't indicate his notability. He even fails GNG because very few sources mention him, and even the sources barely cover him trivially. Even when retired from his field, the guy is still non-notable. No way should this article be used to recruit this guy as a coach in the future. By the way, there are some other people named "Dusty Collins", including non-notable ones. --George Ho (talk) 14:58, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge Redirecting this to an article on the AHL with a little paragraph about this player should work nicely.--Redandready (talk) 16:59, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.