The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dragonlance#Fictional history. If anyone sees anything worth merging, feel free to pull it out the history and move it over. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:07, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dwarfgate Wars (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was previously nominated for deletion in a mass group nomination here, but the discussion was muddled with so many varying articles. The closing administrator suggested that the articles should be nominated individually, which is what I am doing now. A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. This article fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for elements of fiction. Neelix (talk) 02:51, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:51, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, or merge and/or redirect to Dragonlance#Fictional history or maybe War of the Twins. BOZ (talk) 19:56, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge or redirect per BOZ. It appears to be a uniquely named fictional element, no reason a search on it should come up empty, but I don't see the justification for keeping it as a separate article. Jclemens (talk) 02:59, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect for now. It will be there if commentary is found later. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 05:40, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into the Dragonlance fictional history. Doesn't seem to have enough coverage on its own, but could be a search term. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 14:04, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.