The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:37, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ESDO[edit]

ESDO (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)

Appears to not meet the notability criteria guideline laid out in WP:CORP. Also only has a few dozen ghits [1], even worse seems to have just about zilch that are in english [2]. Which would make it difficulty to build up a decent article about this, if it is even possible. Mathmo ^Talk 04:21, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No sources. Without prejudice to coming back later with a properly sourced article, if possible. --Shirahadasha 04:49, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom: cannot find any English language refereence apart from WP clones. --BozMo talk 12:33, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete This article is hopeless. No sources, short, no information at all. Chickyfuzz123^{(user talk)} 00:32, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete bordering on speedy. No sources, no references, no notability. Though, commenting on Chickyfuzz's comment, a lot of articles start out short -   •The RSJ•   Talk | Sign Here 17:37, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to Esdo. See w:de:Esdo. William Avery 22:26, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

whoa, you are right! Very very long article there. Am tempted to change my vote to keep. But.... I fail to see any references to news articles (or books etc...) in the German article? And my German is so close to non-existent I can't tell from reading the article itself what is there that means it is worthwhile keeping. Perhaps I could get my German grandmother to read it out to me! lol More seriously, give us some more info (in English) please and perhaps it is worthwhile keeping after all? Mathmo ^Talk 11:53, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.