The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that in the absence of reliable sourcing to verify, this subject does not meet notability guidelines. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:35, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ESLARED[edit]

ESLARED (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Procedural nomination. This article was originally tagged for speedy deletion, then the CSD tag was removed, and then it was nominated for PROD. The author has contested deletion, so I'm bring this here. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Unless sources can be found, in that case keep. Steve Dufour (talk) 04:20, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, no attribution of notability to reliable and independent sources. --Dhartung | Talk 08:06, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Info checks out via groups its involved with like Internet Society [1] and APC [2] - trying to find much more keeps giving me sites in Spanish - have added to Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Venezuela.-Hunting dog (talk) 08:26, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete there needs to be some meaningful sources to change that opinion. I didn't find them. --Stormbay (talk) 14:34, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.