The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 11:01, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

EToro[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY. the Advertisement was previously deleted under WP:CSD#G11 as Unambiguous advertising or promotion. Seems to be nothing more than Non-Notable Self-promotion, which wikipedia is WP:NOT. Hu12 (talk) 18:03, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 05:06, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 05:06, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep; it appears to pass WP:CORP. If there's a promotional tone it's probably worth putting in a few minutes editing time to fix that, rather than throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Unfortunately a lot of articles on businesses seem to be considered spam by default. bobrayner (talk) 10:16, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:46, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: per Bobrayner - Ret.Prof (talk) 03:20, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.