The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:30, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

EXORCISMS[edit]

EXORCISMS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Unremarkable event/exhibition Anshuk (talk) 08:02, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. -- I'^mperator 12:16, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 08:30, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. No sources, and the fact that we don't have an article on the gallery suggests that it's not notable itself. Tevildo (talk) 09:38, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, not notable - I can only find listing-type mentions. JohnCD (talk) 09:42, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, Clearly not notable. No external sources discussing the event. No claim even made for notability. LK (talk) 11:12, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Exorcism. AlexTiefling (talk) 15:45, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.