- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:39, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Earth Rights Institute[edit]
- Earth Rights Institute (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It does not seem to meet WP:ORGCRIT. Coverage is very scarce. MarioGom (talk) 09:24, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft-deletion (due to contested prod back in 2006 (!) ...)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 10:48, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Article has existed since 2005 but till this moment has cited no single source to demonstrate notability. Searched for sources to support it and prevent its deletion but found nothing tangible. Metroick (talk) 12:32, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: No reliable sources. This should have been deleted when nominated for speedy deletion in 2006 – an editor removed the G11 template without explanation and the article appears to have languished without sources or notability since then. Dan • ✉ 21:59, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.