The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 04:40, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

EastSide United FC[edit]

This article was tagged first for speedy deletion via criterion A7, but denied because the article makes an uncited claim to notability. It was then prodded, but no-one seconded or disputed the PROD. I'm personally a bit uncomfortable deleting this, as it does claim to be a football club with ~2,000 members. Ergo, this is strictly a procedural nom. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 18:27, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This looks more like a youth soccer league than a single team. Even so, notability appears to be only barely more than local. No sources to show otherwise. DarkAudit (talk) 18:38, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Definitely a league.[1] Gsearch gives lots of directory listings, but nothing more than passing mentions in other sources. The single hit for google news is a passing mention in a story about Gavin Wilkinson. No claim of notability in article, and the league does not inherit notability from Gavin Wilkinson. --Fabrictramp (talk) 22:35, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 18:51, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete NN. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 10:31, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NOTE and WP:VERIFY by reference to reliable sources. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:38, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.