The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Chignecto-Central Regional School Board. Whether or not to merge the content there or possibly, at a later date merge/redirect to a new article at Education in Pictou County, Nova Scotia is an editorial matter. (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 23:33, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

East Pictou Middle School[edit]

East Pictou Middle School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable middle school. My attempt at redirecting it to the school board was reverted, and attempts at communication and suggestions for sources were rebuffed. Corvus cornixtalk 23:23, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment May I ask for the user's definition of "suggestions for sources", as all I've gotten from them is AfD outsomes and Wikipedia policies. Cavenba (talkcontribs) 23:28, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not true, not only have I linked Cavenba to the WP:RS page on their Talk page, but I've tagged the article for lack of sourcing, which also links to discussions about sourcing. Corvus cornixtalk 23:33, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL. DoubleBlue (Talk) 23:55, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please read the part of WP:OUTCOMES where it explicitly says that it can't be simply ignored just because it's a list of precedents rather than a binding policy. You need to provide a reason why this particular case should be viewed as an exception to it. And the reason there's an onus on you to find some sources is that you're the one who reverted the redirect. You don't own the article, true, but if you want to make an assertion that the school is sufficiently notable to have its own separate article, then you have to back that statement up with evidence. Bearcat (talk) 14:44, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.