The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:27, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eastfield Cricket Club[edit]

Eastfield Cricket Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable local club that doesn't pass WP:CRIN and does not have significant coverage (or indeed any coverage) in independent reliable sources, so also does not pass WP:GNG. Jenks24 (talk) 16:29, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Jenks24 (talk) 16:32, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Jenks24 (talk) 16:32, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - can find no sources which strongly establish notability. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 20:34, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - can find no sources which weakly establish notability. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 01:14, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as having insufficiently detailed coverage in independent third party sources. If such sources are found and integrated, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:50, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.