The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, no reason to delete. Cowman109Talk 22:57, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Echilamvayal[edit]

vanity Yy-bo 22:23, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per its an actual place.Bakaman Bakatalk 22:33, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.