The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Paul Zane Pilzer. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-23 08:02Z

Economic alchemy[edit]

Neologism coined by one writer, completely unreferenced. Little to no sign anyone else uses it. PROD tag added, but removed by Black Falcon (talk · contribs) with the summary see http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%2B%22economic+alchemy%22+-wikipedia -- the term has use within a specific community - the same Google search I conducted which showed that this is a neologism coined by one writer, with little to no sign anyone else uses it. Calton | Talk 01:36, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Paul Zane Pilzer ZimmerBarnes 01:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Paul Zane Pilzer. I removed the ((prod)) because I did not feel it was a case of uncontroversial deletion rather than a desire to keep this a separate article. Cheers, Black Falcon 03:02, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per above. Assuming the author is notable, a stub of this size has no reason to be split off from his main article. A redirect would cover any issue of "people wondering what Economic Alchemy is about". -Markeer 12:59, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, as above, I suppose; yet another breathless announcement that the laws of thermodynamics have been repealed. Major tranquilizers are indicated in cases of optimism. - Smerdis of Tlön 16:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.