This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep (No consensus). --Ryan Delaney ^talk 04:56, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ed Krebs[edit]

nn-bio He wrote a how-to book on tinting photos and he has an online gallery of his photos. Less than a half-dozen relevant hits, most to his sites. No R/T gallery shows, no media coverage, no publication of his art, no noteworthy reviews. Outlander 21:38, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Pass — Should any published author with books available via Amazon be considered at least marginally notable? I'm not sure. Note that there was also an Ed Krebs who was a professor at UC Davis who appears somewhat more notable.[1] — RJH 15:56, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. If Amazon sells his books, he's notable enough. --DrTorstenHenning 17:50, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I disagree with DrTorstenHenning's standard asserting notability. Dottore So 18:25, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep as this figure does appear to be at least marginally notable within his field. Hall Monitor 19:41, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Mildly notable for his photography and his activism. Should be disambiguated, however. I will do that if the article survives. —Theo (Talk) 09:06, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.