The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 11:30, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edgcumbe F.C.[edit]

Edgcumbe F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. The article is about a club which has never competed in the FA Cup, failing WP:FOOTYN. It plays in the 13th level of the English football league system and has never gone higher, so it also fails the unwritten level 10 cut-off guideline for English clubs. The league they play in contains many reserve teams of South West Peninsula League Premier Division clubs. Argyle 4 Life^talk 09:33, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Argyle 4 Life^talk 09:36, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable club. BigDom (talk) 09:49, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable The computer rocks! (talk) 11:38, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. J Mo 101 (talk) 13:01, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, non-notable club. GiantSnowman 13:23, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Hasn't played at national level, per WP:FOOTYN, so therefore does not reach Notability guidelines. Wikipedian2 (talk) 16:20, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.