The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:58, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edward W. De Barbieri[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It is difficult to believe that an assistant professor (basically the lowest level of professorship and often not tenured) would meet WP:PROF criteria for inclusion. The question is whether his side-position as "Director of the Community Development Clinic" qualifies under our criteria. See also related discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christine Sgarlata Chung, about an another professor article created by the same editor. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:54, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Being a director is not really a WP:PROF criteria and that school apparently has 400 students....Nothing on google scholar either. Galobtter (talk) 07:14, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 08:27, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 08:27, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:28, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete directors of minor programs at any given institution are a dime a dozen. Maybe if we had sources showing his role as director makes him an important person and inpactful in the larger community, but the one source here does not demonstrate such.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:49, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for the same reasons as my delete opinion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christine Sgarlata Chung. By all indicators (citations, academic rank, administrative positions, etc) he is less notable than Chung, and I don't think she's notable either. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:48, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.